MOJ Header

Current Issue - July 2020, Volume 14, Issue No. 2

Official Journal of Malaysian Orthopaedic Association and ASEAN Orthopaedic Association

The Perils of Predatory Journals and Conferences


  1. Ferris LE, Winker MA. Research integrity corner: Special issue on predatory journals. Review. Biochemia Medica 2017;27(2):279-84. doi: org/10.11613/BM.2017.030
  2. COPE Discussion Document: Predatory Publishing. (accessed on 3 May 2020)
  3. De Groote SL, Shultz M, Smalheiser NR. Examining the Impact of the National Institutes of Health Public Access Policy on the citation rates of journal articles. PLoS ONE 2015; 10: e0139951.
  4. Predatory or deceptive publishers – Recommendations for Caution. Council of Science Editors (CSE). (accessed on 12 September 2019)
  5. Shamseer L, Moher D, Maduekwe O, Turner L, Barbour V, Burch R, et al. Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison BMC Med 2017; 15: 28. doi:10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9
  6. Bartholomew RE. Science for sale: the rise of predatory journals. J R Soc Med 2014;107: 384-5.
  7. Beall J. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature 2012; 489: 179. doi:10.1038/489179a
  8. Butler D. Investigating journals: the dark side of publishing. Nature 2013; 495: 433-5.doi: 10.1038/495433a
  9. Silver A. Controversial website that lists ‘predatory’ publishers shuts down. Nature 2017. doi:org/10.1038/nature.2017.21328. (accessed on 7 May2020)
  10. Richtig G, Berger M, Lange-Asschenfeldt, Aberer W, Richtig E. Problems and challenges of predatory journals. Review article. J Eur Acad Dermatol 2018. 32: 1441-49.
  11. Mercier E, Tardif PA, Moore L, Sage NL, Cameron PA. Postgrad Med J 2018; 94:104-8. doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2017- 135097
  12. Cook C. Editorial. Predatory Journals: The Worst Thing in Publishing, Ever. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017; 47(1): 1-2. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.0101
  13. Bohannon J. Who’s afraid of peer review? Science 2013; 342: 60-5. doi: 10.1126/science.342.6154.60.
  14. Noorden RV. Open-access website gets tough. Nature 2014; 512: 17. doi: 10.1038/512017a
  15. Beaubien S, Eckard M. Addressing faculty publishing concerns with open access journal quality indicators. J Libr Sch Commun 2014; 2: eP1133. doi: org/10.7710/2162-3309.1133
  16. Predatory Journals Hit By ‘Star Wars’ Sting. Discover 2017. (accessed on 3 May 2020)
  17. Shen C, Bjork B. ‘Predatory’ open access: A longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Med 2015;13: 230.
  18. Yan JR, Baldawi H, Lex JR, Simchovich G, Baisi LP, Bozzo A, et al. Predatory Publishing in Orthopaedic Research. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018;100: e138(1-48). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01569.
  19. Beshyah SA. Editorial: Fake Academia and Bogus Conferences are on the Rise in the Middle East: Time to Act. Ibnosina J Med Biomed Sci 2017; 9(6). doi: 10.4103/ijmbs.ijmbs_61_17
  20. Asadi A, Rahbar N, Rezvani MJ, Asadi F. Fake/bogus conferences: Their features and some subtle ways to differentiate them from real ones. Sci Eng Ethics 2018; 24:779-84.
  21. Sharma H, Verma S. Predatory conferences in biomedical streams: An invitation for academic upliftment or predator's looking for prey. Saudi J Anaesth 2020; 14(2): 212-6. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_668_19: 10.4103/sja.SJA_668_19
  22. Masten Y, Ashcraft A. Due diligence in the open-access explosion era: choosing a reputable journal for publication. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 2017; 364(21): fnx206 doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnx206
  23. Withdrawal of accepted manuscript from predatory journal. Case number 16 - 22. COPE. (accessed on 2 May 2020)
  24. Offord C. German Scientists Frequently Publish in Predatory Journals. The Scientists 2019. (accessed on 4 May 2020)
  25. Aggarwal R, Gogtay N, Kumar R, Sahni P; Indian Association of Medical Journal Editors. The revised guidelines of the Medical Council of India for academic promotions: need for a rethink. Natl Med J India 2016; 29: 1-5. doi: org/10.4103/0970- 258X.186900
  26. Curry MJ, Lillis T. The dangers of English as lingua franca of journals. Inside Higher Ed 2018. (accessed on 7 May 2020)
  27. Crotty D. Predatory publishing as a rational response to poorly governed academic incentives. The Scholarly Kitchen 2017. (accessed on 7 May 2020)
  28. Frandsen TF. Are predatory journals undermining the credibility of science? A bibliometric analysis of citers. Scientometrics 2017; 113(3): 1513-28. doi: org/10.1007/s11192-017-2520-x
  29. Deprez EE, Chen C. Medical journals have a fake news problem. Bloomberg Businessweek 2017. (accessed on 4 May 2020)
  30. Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing. OASPA. (accessed on 2 May 2020)
  31. Journal vs Articles. DOAJ. (accessed on 2 May 2020)
  32. Scimago Journal and country ranking. on (accessed on 2 May 2020)
  33. Journal Citation Report. (accessed on 2 May 2020)
  34. Information for publishers. DOAJ. (accessed on 2 May 2020)
  35. Check.Submit. An online guide to help researchers identify trusted journals for their research. ( (accessed on 30 May 2020)
  36. Check.Attend. An online guide to help researchers judge the legitimacy and academic credentials of conferences. ( (accessed on 30 May 2020)
  37. World Health Organization (WHO): Global Index Medicus. (accessed on 5 May 2020)
  38. Oransky I, Marcus A. Are predatory publishers’ days numbered? STAT News 2016. https://www. (accessed on 5 May 2020)

Abstract   |   Reference

MOJ footer

About Us

The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is a peer-reviewed journal that is published three times a year in both print and electronic online version. The purpose of this journal is to publish original research studies, evaluation of current practices and case reports in various subspecialties of orthopaedics and traumatology, as well as associated fields like basic science, biomedical engineering, rehabilitation medicine and nursing.

Keep in Touch

creative-commons License