MOJ Header

Ahead of Print Issue - March 2021, Volume 15, Issue No. 1

Official Journal of Malaysian Orthopaedic Association and ASEAN Orthopaedic Association

Validity and Reliability of the Malay Version of the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (IdFAI-M) Questionnaire among Malaysian University Athletes


  1. Yeung MS, Chan KM, So CH, Yuan WY. An epidemiological survey on ankle sprain. Br J Sports Med. 1994; 28(2): 112-6. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.28.2.112
  2. Gerber JP, Williams GN, Scoville CR, Arciero RA, Taylor DC. Persistent disability associated with ankle sprains: a prospective examination of an athletic population. Foot Ankle Int. 1998; 19(10): 653-60. doi: 10.1177/107110079801901002
  3. Braun BL. Effects of ankle sprain in a general clinic population 6 to 18 months after medical evaluation. Arch Fam Med. 1999; 8(2): 143-8. doi: 10.1001/archfami.8.2.143
  4. Delahunt E, Monaghan K, Caulfield B. Ankle function during hopping in subjects with functional instability of the ankle joint. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2007; 17(6): 641-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2006.00612.x
  5. Hertel J. Functional Anatomy, Pathomechanics, and Pathophysiology of Lateral Ankle Instability. J Athl Train. 2002; 37(4): 364-75.
  6. Tropp H, Odenrick P, Gillquist J. Stabilometry recordings in functional and mechanical instability of the ankle joint. Int J Sports Med. 1985; 6(3): 180-2. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1025836
  7. Freeman MA, Dean MR, Hanham IW. The etiology and prevention of functional instability of the foot. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1965; 47(4): 678-85.
  8. Docherty CL, Gansneder BM, Arnold BL, Hurwitz SR. Development and reliability of the ankle instability instrument. J Athl Train. 2006; 41(2): 154-8.
  9. Ross SE, Guskiewicz KM, Gross MT, Yu B. Assessment tools for identifying functional limitations associated with functional ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2008; 43(1): 44-50. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.1.44
  10. Eechaute C, Vaes P, Duquet W. The chronic ankle instability scale: clinimetric properties of a multidimensional, patient-assessed instrument. Phys Ther Sport. 2008; 9(2): 57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2008.02.001
  11. Hiller CE, Refshauge KM, Bundy AC, Herbert RD, Kilbreath SL. The Cumberland ankle instability tool: a report of validity and reliability testing. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87(9): 1235-41. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.022
  12. Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Burdett RG, Conti SF, Swearingen J. Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Foot Ankle Int. 2005; 26(11): 968-83. doi: 10.1177/107110070502601113
  13. Hubbard TJ, Kaminski TW. Kinesthesia is not Affected by Functional Ankle Instability Status. J Athl Train. 2002; 37(4): 481-6.
  14. Roos EM, Brandsson S, Karlsson J. Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int. 2001; 22(10): 788-94. doi: 10.1177/107110070102201004
  15. Donahue M, Simon J, Docherty CL. Critical review of self-reported functional ankle instability measures. Foot Ankle Int. 2011; 32(12): 1140-6. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2011.1140
  16. Simon J, Donahue M, Docherty C. Development of the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (IdFAI). Foot Ankle Int. 2012; 33(9): 755-63. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2012.0755
  17. Simon J, Donahue M, Docherty CL. Critical review of self-reported functional ankle instability measures: a follow up. Phys Ther Sport. 2014; 15(2): 97-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2013.03.005
  18. Ko J, Rosen AB, Brown CN. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validation of the Korean version of the identification functional ankle instability (IdFAI). Disabil Rehabil. 2018; 40(26): 3185-90. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1375032
  19. Li Y, Guan L, Ko J, Zhang S, Brown CN, Simpson KJ. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of an ankle instability questionnaire for use in Chinese-speaking population. J Sport Health Sci. 2019;8(6):555-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2017.04.003
  20. Martinez BR, Sauers ADL, Ferreira CL, de Castro Lugli L, Turchetto PCG, et al. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and measurement properties of the Brazilian version of the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (IdFAI) questionnaire. Phys Ther Sport. 2018; 29: 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2017.09.004
  21. Maher CG, Latimer J, Costa LOP. The relevance of cross-cultural adaptation and clinimetrics for physical therapy instruments. Braz J Phys Ther. 2007; 11: 245-52. doi: 10.1590/S1413-35552007000400002
  22. Delgreco L, Walop W, Eastridge L. Questionnaire Development: 3. Translation. CMAJ. 1987; 136(8): 817-8.
  23. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993; 46(12): 1417-32. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-n
  24. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(24): 3186-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
  25. Nauck T, Lohrer H. Translation, cross-cultural adaption and validation of the German version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure for patients with chronic ankle instability. Br J Sports Med. 2011; 45(10): 785-90. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.067637
  26. Epstein J, Santo RM, Guillemin F. A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015; 68(4): 435-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.021
  27. Tsang S, Royse CF, Terkawi AS. Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017; 11(Suppl 1): S80-9. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17
  28. Bujang MA, Baharum N. A simplified guide to determination of sample size requirements for estimating the value of intraclass correlation coefficient: a review. Arch Orofac Sci. 2017; 12(1): 1-11.
  29. Zamanzadeh V, Ghahramanian A, Rassouli M, Abbaszadeh A, Alavi-Majd H, Nikanfar AR. Design and Implementation Content Validity Study: Development of an instrument for measuring Patient-Centered Communication. J Caring Sci. 2015; 4(2): 165-78. doi: 10.15171/jcs.2015.017
  30. Bolarinwa OA. Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of questionnaires used in social and health science researches. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2015; 22(4): 195-201. doi: 10.4103/1117-1936.173959
  31. Leguina A. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Int J Res Meth Educ. 2015; 38(2): 220-1. doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2015.1005806
  32. Eechaute C, Vaes P, Van Aerschot L, Asman S, Duquet W. The clinimetric qualities of patient-assessed instruments for measuring chronic ankle instability: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007; 8: 6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-6
  33. Marx RG, Menezes A, Horovitz L, Jones EC, Warren RF. A comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instruments. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003; 56(8): 730-5. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00084-2
  34. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420-8. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420
  35. Rousson V, Gasser T, Seifert B. Assessing intrarater, interrater and test-retest reliability of continuous measurements. Stat Med. 2002; 21(22): 3431-46. doi: 10.1002/sim.1253
  36. McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012; 22(3): 276-82.
  37. Chan SH, Lay YF. Examining the Reliability and Validity of Research Instruments Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). J Balt Sci Educ. 2018; 17(2): 239-51.
  38. Sperber AD. Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research. Gastroenterology. 2004; 126(1 Suppl 1): S124-8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.016
  39. Mohamadi S, Dadgoo M, Ebrahimi I, Salavati M, Saeedi A, Valiollahi B. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability questionnaire in Persian speaking participants with a history of ankle sprain. Disabil Rehabil, 2019; 41(16): 1931-6. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1452053
  40. Mineta S, Inami T, Fukano M, Hoshiba T, Masuda Y, Yoshimura A, et al. The reliability, and discriminative ability of the identification of functional ankle instability questionnaire, Japanese version. Phys Ther Sport. 2019; 35: 1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2018.10.013
  41. Donahue M, Simon J, Docherty CL. Reliability and validity of a new questionnaire created to establish the presence of functional ankle instability: the IdFAI. Athl Train Sports Health Care. 2013; 5(1): 38-43.
  42. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. J Mark Res. 1981; 18(1): 39-50. doi: 10.2307/3151312
  43. Hulland J. Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strateg Manag J. 1999; 20(2): 195-204.
  44. Rahim MA, Magner NR. Confirmatory factor analysis of the styles of handling interpersonal conflict: first-order factor model and its invariance across groups. J Appl Psychol. 1995; 80(1): 122-32. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.80.1.122
  45. Wieland A, Durach CF, Kembro J, Treiblmaier H. Statistical and judgmental criteria for scale purification. Int J Supply Chain Manag. 2017; 22(4): 321-8. doi: 10.1108/SCM-07-2016-0230
  46. Cambra-Fierro JJ, Polo-Redondo Y. Creating satisfaction in the demand-supply chain: the buyers' perspective. Int J Supply Chain Manag. 2008; 13(3): 211-24. doi: 10.1108/13598540810871253
  47. McNeish D. Thanks coefficient alpha, we'll take it from here. Psychol Methods. 2018; 23(3): 412-33. doi: 10.1037/met0000144
  48. Yang YY, Green SB. Coefficient Alpha: A Reliability Coefficient for the 21st Century?. J Psychoeduc Assess. 2011; 29(4): 377-92. doi: 10.1177/0734282911406668
  49. Peterson RA, Kim Y. On the relationship between coefficient alpha and composite reliability. J Appl Psychol. 2013; 98(1): 194-8. doi: 10.1037/a0030767
  50. Ali F, Rasoolimanesh SM, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Ryu K. An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in hospitality research. Int J Contemp Hosp. 2018; 30(1): 514-38. doi: 10.1108/IJCHM-10-2016-0568

Abstract   |   Reference

MOJ footer

About Us

The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is a peer-reviewed journal that is published three times a year in both print and electronic online version. The purpose of this journal is to publish original research studies, evaluation of current practices and case reports in various subspecialties of orthopaedics and traumatology, as well as associated fields like basic science, biomedical engineering, rehabilitation medicine and nursing.

Keep in Touch

creative-commons License