MOJ Header

Ahead of Print Issue - March 2021, Volume 15, Issue No. 1

Official Journal of Malaysian Orthopaedic Association and ASEAN Orthopaedic Association

Reliability of Imageless Computer-Assisted Navigation for Femoral Rotational Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty


  1. Nicoll D, Rowley DI. Internal rotational error of the tibial component is a major cause of pain after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010; 92(9):1238-44. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B9.23516
  2. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991; 73(5): 709-14. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.73B5.1894655
  3. Abadie P, Galaud B, Michaut M, Fallet L, Boisrenoult P, Beaufils P. Distal femur rotational alignment and patellar subluxation: a CT scan in vivo assessment. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009; 95(4): 267-71. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.04.004
  4. Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998; (356): 144-53. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199811000-00021
  5. Hofmann S, Romero J, Roth-Schiffl E, Albrecht T. [Rotational malalignment of the components may cause chronic pain or early failure in total knee arthroplasty]. Orthopade. 2003; 32(6): 469-76. doi: 10.1007/s00132-003-0503-5
  6. Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneucker H, Moemans A. Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002; 84(1): 50-3. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b1.12432
  7. Kumar PJ, Dorr LD. Severe malalignment and soft-tissue imbalance in total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg. 1997; 10(1): 36-41.
  8. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; (404): 7-13. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200211000-00003
  9. Incavo SJ, Wild JJ, Coughlin KM, Beynnon BD. Early revision for component malrotation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; 458: 131-6. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e3180332d97
  10. Mizu-uchi H, Matsuda S, Miura H, Okazaki K, Akasaki Y, Iwamoto Y. The evaluation of post-operative alignment in total knee replacement using a CT-based navigation system. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90(8): 1025-31. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B8.20265.
  11. Chauhan SK, Clark GW, Lloyd S, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Sikorski JM. Computer-assisted total knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol). J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86(6): 818-23. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b6.15456
  12. Yau WP, Leung A, Chiu KY, Tang WM, Ng TP. Intraobserver errors in obtaining visually selected anatomic landmarks during registration process in nonimage-based navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric experiment. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20(5): 591-601. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.02.011
  13. Hernandez-Vaquero D, Suarez-Vazquez A, Sandoval-Garcia MA, Noriega-Fernandez A. Computer assistance increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty with articular deformity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(5): 1237-41. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1175-1
  14. Choong PF, Dowsey MM, Stoney JD. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24(4): 560-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.02.018
  15. Stockl B, Nogler M, Rosiek R, Fischer M, Krismer M, Kessler O. Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (426): 180-6. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000136835.40566.d9
  16. Vanin N, Panzica M, Dikos G, Krettek C, Hankemeier S. Rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty: intraoperative interand intraobserver reliability of Whiteside's line. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011; 131(11): 1477-80. doi: 10.1007/s00402-011-1329-y
  17. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Luring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86(5): 682-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b5.14927
  18. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86(3): 372-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b3.14643
  19. Chin PL, Yang KY, Yeo SJ, Lo NN. Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20(5): 618-26. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.04.004
  20. Pang CH, Chan WL, Yen CH, Cheng SC, Woo SB, Choi ST, et al. Comparison of total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted navigation versus conventional guiding systems: a prospective study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2009; 17(2): 170-3. doi: 10.1177/230949900901700209
  21. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(2): 236-43. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00386
  22. Longstaff LM, Sloan K, Stamp N, Scaddan M, Beaver R. Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24(4): 570-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.03.002
  23. Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R, Banel D, Fahrbach K. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22(8): 1097-106. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.08.001
  24. Haaker RG, Stockheim M, Kamp M, Proff G, Breitenfelder J, Ottersbach A. Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; (433): 152-9. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000150564.31880.c4
  25. Bottros J, Klika AK, Lee HH, Polousky J, Barsoum WK. The use of navigation in total knee arthroplasty for patients with extraarticular deformity. J Arthroplasty. 2008; 23(1): 74-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.01.021
  26. Klein GR, Austin MS, Smith EB, Hozack WJ. Total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted navigation in patients with deformities of the femur and tibia. J Arthroplasty. 2006; 21(2): 284-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.07.013
  27. Cheng T, Zhang G, Zhang X. Imageless navigation system does not improve component rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Surg Res. 2011; 171(2): 590-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.05.006
  28. Hetaimish BM, Khan MM, Simunovic N, Al-Harbi HH, Bhandari M, Zalzal PK. Meta-analysis of navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012; 27(6): 1177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.12.028.
  29. Meijer MF, Reininga IHF, Boerboom AL, Bulstra SK, Stevens M. Does imageless computer-assisted TKA lead to improved rotational alignment or fewer outliers? A systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472(10): 3124-33. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3688-5
  30. Lee JK, Lee S, Chun SH, Kim KT, Lee MC. Rotational alignment of femoral component with different methods in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017; 25; 18(1): 217. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1574-5
  31. Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instrument in psychology. Psychol Assess. 1994; 6(4): 284-90. 6(4), 284–290. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
  32. Benjamin J. Determining femoral component position using CAS and measured resection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(11):2745-50. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0426-x
  33. Manzotti A, Cerveri P, De Momi E, Pullen C, Confalonieri N. Relationship between cutting errors and learning curve in computer-assisted total knee replacement. Int Orthop. 2010; 34(5): 655-62. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0816-z
  34. Catani F, Biasca N, Ensini A, Leardini A, Bianchi L, Digennaro V, et al. Alignment deviation between bone resection and final implant positioning in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(4): 765-71. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00293
  35. Amanatullah DF, Di Cesare PE, Meere PA, Pereira GC. Identification of the landmark registration safe zones during total knee arthroplasty using an imageless navigation system. J Arthroplasty. 2013; 28(6): 938-42. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.12.013
  36. van der Linden-van der Zwaag HMJ, Bos J, van der Heide HJL, Nelissen RGHH. A computed tomography based study on rotational alignment accuracy of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery. Int Orthop. 2011; 35(6): 845-50. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1082-9
  37. Confalonieri N, Chemello C, Cerveri P, Manzotti A. Is computer-assisted total knee replacement for beginners or experts? Prospective study among three groups of patients treated by surgeons with different levels of experience. J Orthop Traumatol. 2012; 13(4): 203-10. doi: 10.1007/s10195-012-0205-z
  38. Jenny JY, Picard F. Learning navigation - Learning with navigation. A review. SICOT J. 2017; 3: 39. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2017025

Abstract   |   Reference

MOJ footer

About Us

The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is a peer-reviewed journal that is published three times a year in both print and electronic online version. The purpose of this journal is to publish original research studies, evaluation of current practices and case reports in various subspecialties of orthopaedics and traumatology, as well as associated fields like basic science, biomedical engineering, rehabilitation medicine and nursing.

Keep in Touch

creative-commons License