MOJ Header

Ahead of Print Issue - July 2021, Volume 15, Issue No. 2

Official Journal of Malaysian Orthopaedic Association and ASEAN Orthopaedic Association

Early Clinical Outcomes of Short versus Long Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-rotation (PFNA) in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures


  1. Kannus P, Parkkari J, Sievänen H, Heinonen A, Vuori I, Järvinen M. Epidemiology of hip fractures. Bone. 1996; 18(1 Suppl): S57-63.
  2. Erivan R, Villatte G, Dartus J, Reina N, Descamps S, Boisgard S. Progression and projection for hip surgery in France, 2008-2070: Epidemiologic study with trend and projection analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019; 105(7): 1227-35.
  3. Michelson JD, Myers A, Jinnah R, Cox Q, Van MN. Epidemiology of hip fractures among the elderly. Risk factors for fracture type. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; (311): 129-35.
  4. Flikweert ER, Wendt KW, Diercks RL, Izaks GJ, Landsheer D, Stevens M, et al. Complications after hip fracture surgery: are they preventable? Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018; 44(4): 573-80.
  5. Anglen JO, Weinstein JN, American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Research Committee. Nail or plate fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: changing pattern of practice: a review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(4): 700-07.
  6. Yang YH, Wang YR, Jiang SD, Jiang LS. Proximal femoral nail antirotation and third-generation Gamma nail: which is a better device for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Singapore Med J. 2013; 54(8): 446-50.
  7. Norris R, Bhattacharjee D, Parker MJ. Occurrence of secondary fracture around intramedullary nails used for trochanteric hip fractures: a systematic review of 13,568 patients. Injury. 2012; 43(6): 706-11.
  8. Bridle SH, Patel AD, Bircher M, Calvert PT. Fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. A randomised prospective comparison of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991; 73(2): 330-4.
  9. Chang SM, Song DL, Ma Z, Tao YL, Chen WL, Zhang LZ, et al. Mismatch of the short straight cephalomedullary nail (PFNAII) with the anterior bow of the femur in an Asian population. J Orthop Trauma. 2014; 28(1): 17-22.
  10. Leung KS, Procter P, Robioneck B, Behrens K. Geometric mismatch of the Gamma nail to the Chinese femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; (323): 42-8.
  11. Barquet A, Francescoli L, Rienzi D, López L. Intertrochanteric-subtrochanteric fractures: treatment with the long Gamma nail. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;1 4: 324-8
  12. Kanakaris NK, Tosounidis TH, Giannoudis PV. Nailing intertrochanteric hip fractures: short versus long; locked versus nonlocked. Journal of orthopaedic trauma. 2015; 29: S10-6.
  13. Boone C, Carlberg KN, Koueiter DM, Baker KC, Sadowski J, Wiater PJ, et al. Short versus long intramedullary nails for treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (OTA 31-A1 and A2). J Orthop Trauma. 2014; 28(5): e96-100.
  14. Hou Z, Bowen TR, Irgit KS, Matzko ME, Andreychik CM, Horwitz DS, et al. Treatment of pertrochanteric fractures (OTA 31-A1 and A2): long versus short cephalomedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma. 2013; 27(6): 318-24.
  15. Raval P, Ramasamy A, Raza H, Khan K, Awan N. Comparison of short vs long anti-ratation in treating trochanteric fractures. Malays Orthop J. 2016; 10: 22.
  16. Kleweno C, Morgan J, Redshaw J, Harris M, Rodriguez E, Zurakowski D, et al. Short versus long cephalomedullary nails for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures in patients older than 65 years. J Orthop Trauma. 2014; 28(7): 391-7.
  17. Vaughn J, Cohen E, Vopat BG, Kane P, Abbood E, Born C. Complications of short versus long cephalomedullary nail for intertrochanteric femur fractures, minimum 1 year follow-up. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology. 2015; 25:665-70.
  18. Li X, Zhang L, Hou Z, Meng Z, Chen W, Wang P, et al. Distal locked and unlocked nailing for perthrochanteric fractures—a prospective comparative randomized study. Int Orthop. 2015; 39(8): 1645-52.
  19. Ozkan K, Unay K, Demircay C, Cakir M, Eceviz E. Distal unlocked proximal femoral intramedullary nailing for intertrochanteric femur fractures. Int Orthop. 2009; 3395): 1397-400.
  20. Rosenblum SF, Zuckerman JD, Kummer FJ, Tam BS. A biomechanical evaluation of the Gamma nail. J Boint Joint Surg Am. 1992; 74(3): 352-7.
  21. Li Z, Liu Y, Liang Y, Zhao C, Zhang Y. Short versus long intramedullary nails for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures in patients older than 65 years. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015; 8(4): 6299-302.
  22. Parker MJ, Handoll HH. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008; (3): CD000093.
  23. Sears BR, Ostrum RF, Litsky AS. A mechanical study of gap motion in cadaveric femurs using short and long supracondylar nails. J Orthop Trauma. 2004; 18(6): 354-60.
  24. Radaideh AM, Qudaj HA, Audat ZA, Jahmani RA, Yousef IR, Saleh AA. Functional and radiologica; results of proximal femoral antirotation (PFNA) osteosynthesis in the treatment if unstable petrochanteric fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2004; 18: 354-60.
  25. Krigbaum H, Takemoto S, Kim HT, Kuo AC. Costs, and complications of short versus long cephalomedullary nailing of OTA 31-A2 proximal femur fractures in US veterans. J Orthop Trauma. 2016; 30(3): 125-9.
  26. Norris R, Parker M. Diabetes mellitus and hip fracture: a study of 5966 cases. Injury. 2011; 42: 1313-6.
  27. Khan SK, Rushton SP, Dosani A, Gray AC, Deehan DJ. Factors influencing length of stay and mortality after first and second hip fractures: an event modeling analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2013; 27(2): 82-6.
  28. Wright RC, Yacoubian SV, Salzman GA, Raven R, Falkinstein Y, Yacoubian SV. The extended-short nail system, a novel concept in the management of proximal femur fractures. Am J Orthop. 2011; 40: 630-5.
  29. Hong JB, Dan Y, Ouyang L, Liu Y, Xiong LM, Li S, et al. Biomechanical study on different lengths of PFNA fixation for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2017; 17(4): 299-302.

Abstract   |   Reference

MOJ footer

About Us

The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is a peer-reviewed journal that is published three times a year in both print and electronic online version. The purpose of this journal is to publish original research studies, evaluation of current practices and case reports in various subspecialties of orthopaedics and traumatology, as well as associated fields like basic science, biomedical engineering, rehabilitation medicine and nursing.

Keep in Touch

creative-commons License