MOJ Header

Ahead of Print Issue - July 2021, Volume 15, Issue No. 2

Official Journal of Malaysian Orthopaedic Association and ASEAN Orthopaedic Association

Mismatch between Conventional Femoral Arthroplasty Stems and Hip Morphology in the Elderly Chinese Hip Fracture Population


  1. Umer M, Sepah YJ, Khan A, Wazir A, Ahmed M, Jawad MU. Morphology of the proximal femur in a Pakistani population. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2010; 18(3): 279-81. doi: 10.1177/230949901001800304
  2. Rubin PJ, Leyvraz PF, Aubaniac JM, Argenson JN, Estève P, de Roguin B. The morphology of the proximal femur. A threedimensional radiographic analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992; 74(1): 28-32. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.74B1.1732260
  3. Tang ZH, Yeoh CS, Tan GM. Radiographic study of the proximal femur morphology of elderly patients with femoral neck fractures: is there a difference among ethnic groups? Singapore Med J. 2017; 58(12): 717-20. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2016148
  4. Little NJ, Busch CA, Gallagher JA, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Acetabular polyethylene wear and acetabular inclination and femoral offset. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467(11): 2895-900. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0845-3
  5. Lecerf G, Fessy MH, Philippot R, Massin P, Giraud F, Flecher X, et al. Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009; 95(3): 210-9. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.03.010
  6. Mahmood SS, Mukka SS, Crnalic S, Wretenberg P, Sayed-Noor AS. Association between changes in global femoral offset after total hip arthroplasty and function, quality of life, and abductor muscle strength. A prospective cohort study of 222 patients. Acta Orthop. 2016; 87(1): 36-41. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1091955
  7. Buecking B, Boese CK, Bergmeister VA, Frink M, Ruchholtz S, Lechler P. Functional implications of femoral offset following hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture. Int Orthop. 2016; 40(7): 1515-21. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2828-1
  8. Charles MN, Bourne RB, Davey JR, Greenwald AS, Morrey BF, Rorabeck CH. Soft-Tissue Balancing of the Hip: The Role of Femoral Offset Restoration. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86(5): 1078-88.
  9. McGrory BJ, Morrey BF, Cahalan TD, An KN, Cabanela ME. Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995; 77-B(6): 865-9.
  10. Liebs TR, Nasser L, Herzberg W, Rüther W, Hassenpflug J. The influence of femoral offset on health-related quality of life after total hip replacement. Bone Joint J. 2014; 96-B(1): 36-42. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B1.31530
  11. Iorio R, Healy WL, Warren PD, Appleby D. Lateral Trochanteric Pain Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006; 21(2): 233-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.03.041
  12. Cassidy KA, Noticewala MS, Macaulay W, Lee JH, Geller JA. Effect of femoral offset on pain and function after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012; 27(10): 1863-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.05.001
  13. Byun HY, Shin H, Lee ES, Kong MS, Lee SH, Lee CH. The Availability of Radiological Measurement of Femoral Anteversion Angle: Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Reconstruction. Ann Rehabil Med. 2016; 40(2): 237-43. doi: 10.5535/arm.2016.40.2.237
  14. Sugano N, Noble PC, Kamaric E. A comparison of alternative methods of measuring femoral anteversion. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998; 22(4): 610-4. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199807000-00019

Abstract   |   Reference

MOJ footer

About Us

The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is a peer-reviewed journal that is published three times a year in both print and electronic online version. The purpose of this journal is to publish original research studies, evaluation of current practices and case reports in various subspecialties of orthopaedics and traumatology, as well as associated fields like basic science, biomedical engineering, rehabilitation medicine and nursing.

Keep in Touch

creative-commons License