MOJ Header

Current Issue - July 2019, Volume 13, Issue No. 2

Official Journal of Malaysian Orthopaedic Association and ASEAN Orthopaedic Association

Periprosthetic Fractures after Total Knee Arthroplasty: the Influence of Pre-Operative Mechanical Factors versus Intraoperative Factors


  1. Bourne R, Chesworth B, Davies A, Mahomed N, Charron K. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: Who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(1): 57-63.
  2. Lizaur-Utrilla A, Miralles-Munoz F, Sanz-Reig J. Functional Outcome of total knee arthroplasty after periprosthetic distal femoral fracture. J Arthroplasty. 2013; 28(9): 1585-8.
  3. Merkel K, Johnson E. Supracondylar fracture of the femur after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986; 68(1): 29- 43.
  4. Meek R, Norwood T, Smith R, Brenkel I, Howie C. The risk of peri-prosthetic fracture after primary and revision total hip and knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011; 93(1): 96-101.
  5. Rorabeck C, Taylor J. Periprosthetic fractures of the femur complicating total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999; 30(2): 265-77.
  6. McAuley J, Harrer M, Ammeen D, Engh G. Outcome of knee arthroplasty in patients with poor preoperative range of motion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; (404): 203-7.
  7. Parvizi J, Jain N, Schmidt A. Periprosthetic knee fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2008; 22(9): 663-71.
  8. Gross J, Fetto J, Rosen E. Exame musculoesqueletico. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2000.
  9. Poletto P, Sato T, Carnaz L, Lobo Da Costa P, Gil Coury H. Do Individuals who present a static difference between the knees also present a difference during gait? Revista Brasilia de Fisioterapia. 2007; 11(1): 43-8.
  10. Gujarati N, Putti A, Abboud R, Maclean J, Espley A, Kellett C. Risk of periprosthetic fracture after anterior notching. Acta Orthop. 2009; 5(80): 553-6.
  11. Kim K, Egol K, Hozack W, Parvizi J. Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasties. Clin Ortho Relat Res. 2006; 446: 167-75.
  12. Figgie M, Goldberg V, Figgie H, Sobel M. The results of treatment of supracondylar fracture above total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1990; 5(3): 267-76.
  13. Inglis A, Walker P. Revision of failed knee replacements using fixed-axis hinges. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991; 73(5): 57-61.
  14. Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Adams JB. Why knee replacements fail in 2013: Patient, surgeon or implant? Bone Joint J. 2014; 96-B (11 Supple A): 101-4.
  15. Favorito PJ, Mihalko WM, Krackow KA. Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Valgus Knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2002; 10(1): 16-24.
  16. Bade M, Kittelson J, Kohrt W, Stevens-Lapsley J. Predicting functional performance and range of motion outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. Am J Phys Med & Rehabil. 2014; 93(7): 579-85.
  17. Lanshammar K, Ribom E. Differences in muscle strength in dominant and non-dominant leg in females aged 20-39 years – a population based study. Phys Ther Sport. 2011; 12(2): 76-9.
  18. Young P, Whitall J, Bair W, Rogers M. Leg preference associated with protective stepping responses in older adults. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2013; 28(8): 927-32.
  19. Shawen S, Belmont P, Klemme W, Topoleski L, Orchowski J. Osteoporosis and anterior femoral notching in periprosthetic supracondylar fractures: a biomechanical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85(1): 115-21.
  20. Lesh M, Schneider D, Deol G, Davis B, Jacobs C, Pellegrini V. The consequences of anterior femoral notching in total knee arthroplasty: a biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82(8): 1096-101.
  21. Ritter M, Thong A, Keating E, Faris P, Meding J, Berend M et al. The effect of femoral notching during total knee arthroplasty on the prevalence of postoperative femoral fractures and on clinical outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87(11): 2411-4.
  22. Jethanandani R, Patwary M, Shellito A, Meehan J, Amantullah D. Biomechanical consequences of anterior femoral notching in cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016; 45(5): 268-72.

Abstract   |   Reference

MOJ footer

About Us

The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is a peer-reviewed journal that is published three times a year in both print and electronic online version. The purpose of this journal is to publish original research studies, evaluation of current practices and case reports in various subspecialties of orthopaedics and traumatology, as well as associated fields like basic science, biomedical engineering, rehabilitation medicine and nursing.

Keep in Touch

creative-commons License