Ahead of Print Issue - March 2021, Volume 15, Issue No. 1

1. Nicoll D, Rowley DI. Internal rotational error of the tibial component is a major cause of pain after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010; 92(9):1238-44. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B9.23516
2. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991; 73(5): 709-14. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.73B5.1894655
3. Abadie P, Galaud B, Michaut M, Fallet L, Boisrenoult P, Beaufils P. Distal femur rotational alignment and patellar subluxation: a CT scan in vivo assessment. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009; 95(4): 267-71. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.04.004
4. Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998; (356): 144-53. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199811000-00021
5. Hofmann S, Romero J, Roth-Schiffl E, Albrecht T. [Rotational malalignment of the components may cause chronic pain or early failure in total knee arthroplasty]. Orthopade. 2003; 32(6): 469-76. doi: 10.1007/s00132-003-0503-5
6. Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneucker H, Moemans A. Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002; 84(1): 50-3. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b1.12432
7. Kumar PJ, Dorr LD. Severe malalignment and soft-tissue imbalance in total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg. 1997; 10(1): 36-41.
8. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; (404): 7-13. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200211000-00003
9. Incavo SJ, Wild JJ, Coughlin KM, Beynnon BD. Early revision for component malrotation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; 458: 131-6. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e3180332d97
10. Mizu-uchi H, Matsuda S, Miura H, Okazaki K, Akasaki Y, Iwamoto Y. The evaluation of post-operative alignment in total knee replacement using a CT-based navigation system. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90(8): 1025-31. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B8.20265.
11. Chauhan SK, Clark GW, Lloyd S, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Sikorski JM. Computer-assisted total knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol). J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86(6): 818-23. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b6.15456
12. Yau WP, Leung A, Chiu KY, Tang WM, Ng TP. Intraobserver errors in obtaining visually selected anatomic landmarks during registration process in nonimage-based navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric experiment. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20(5): 591-601. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.02.011
13. Hernandez-Vaquero D, Suarez-Vazquez A, Sandoval-Garcia MA, Noriega-Fernandez A. Computer assistance increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty with articular deformity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(5): 1237-41. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1175-1
14. Choong PF, Dowsey MM, Stoney JD. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24(4): 560-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.02.018
15. Stockl B, Nogler M, Rosiek R, Fischer M, Krismer M, Kessler O. Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (426): 180-6. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000136835.40566.d9
16. Vanin N, Panzica M, Dikos G, Krettek C, Hankemeier S. Rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty: intraoperative interand intraobserver reliability of Whiteside's line. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011; 131(11): 1477-80. doi: 10.1007/s00402-011-1329-y
17. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Luring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86(5): 682-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b5.14927
18. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86(3): 372-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b3.14643
19. Chin PL, Yang KY, Yeo SJ, Lo NN. Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20(5): 618-26. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.04.004
20. Pang CH, Chan WL, Yen CH, Cheng SC, Woo SB, Choi ST, et al. Comparison of total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted navigation versus conventional guiding systems: a prospective study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2009; 17(2): 170-3. doi: 10.1177/230949900901700209
21. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(2): 236-43. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00386
22. Longstaff LM, Sloan K, Stamp N, Scaddan M, Beaver R. Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24(4): 570-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.03.002
23. Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R, Banel D, Fahrbach K. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22(8): 1097-106. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.08.001
24. Haaker RG, Stockheim M, Kamp M, Proff G, Breitenfelder J, Ottersbach A. Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; (433): 152-9. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000150564.31880.c4
25. Bottros J, Klika AK, Lee HH, Polousky J, Barsoum WK. The use of navigation in total knee arthroplasty for patients with extraarticular deformity. J Arthroplasty. 2008; 23(1): 74-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.01.021
26. Klein GR, Austin MS, Smith EB, Hozack WJ. Total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted navigation in patients with deformities of the femur and tibia. J Arthroplasty. 2006; 21(2): 284-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.07.013
27. Cheng T, Zhang G, Zhang X. Imageless navigation system does not improve component rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Surg Res. 2011; 171(2): 590-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.05.006
28. Hetaimish BM, Khan MM, Simunovic N, Al-Harbi HH, Bhandari M, Zalzal PK. Meta-analysis of navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012; 27(6): 1177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.12.028.
29. Meijer MF, Reininga IHF, Boerboom AL, Bulstra SK, Stevens M. Does imageless computer-assisted TKA lead to improved rotational alignment or fewer outliers? A systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472(10): 3124-33. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3688-5
30. Lee JK, Lee S, Chun SH, Kim KT, Lee MC. Rotational alignment of femoral component with different methods in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017; 25; 18(1): 217. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1574-5
31. Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instrument in psychology. Psychol Assess. 1994; 6(4): 284-90. 6(4), 284–290. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
32. Benjamin J. Determining femoral component position using CAS and measured resection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(11):2745-50. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0426-x
33. Manzotti A, Cerveri P, De Momi E, Pullen C, Confalonieri N. Relationship between cutting errors and learning curve in computer-assisted total knee replacement. Int Orthop. 2010; 34(5): 655-62. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0816-z
34. Catani F, Biasca N, Ensini A, Leardini A, Bianchi L, Digennaro V, et al. Alignment deviation between bone resection and final implant positioning in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(4): 765-71. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00293
35. Amanatullah DF, Di Cesare PE, Meere PA, Pereira GC. Identification of the landmark registration safe zones during total knee arthroplasty using an imageless navigation system. J Arthroplasty. 2013; 28(6): 938-42. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.12.013
36. van der Linden-van der Zwaag HMJ, Bos J, van der Heide HJL, Nelissen RGHH. A computed tomography based study on rotational alignment accuracy of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery. Int Orthop. 2011; 35(6): 845-50. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1082-9
37. Confalonieri N, Chemello C, Cerveri P, Manzotti A. Is computer-assisted total knee replacement for beginners or experts? Prospective study among three groups of patients treated by surgeons with different levels of experience. J Orthop Traumatol. 2012; 13(4): 203-10. doi: 10.1007/s10195-012-0205-z
38. Jenny JY, Picard F. Learning navigation - Learning with navigation. A review. SICOT J. 2017; 3: 39. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2017025

Abstract   |   Reference