MOJ Header

Current Issue - March 2024, Volume 18, Issue No. 1

Official Journal of Malaysian Orthopaedic Association and ASEAN Orthopaedic Association

Accuracy of Femoral Component External Rotation with all Burr Robotic Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

References

  1. Varacallo M, Luo TD, Johanson NA.Total Knee Arthroplasty Techniques. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021.
  2. Loures FB, Furtado Neto S, Pinto Rde L, Kinder A, Labronici PJ, Góes RF, et al. Rotational assessment of distal femur and its relevance in total knee arthroplasty: analysis by magnetic resonance imaging. Radiol Bras. 2015; 48(5): 282-6. doi: 10.1590/0100-3984.2014.0037
  3. Cho Y, Lee MC. Rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Asia-Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2014; 4(1): 113-8. doi: 10.1016/j.asmart.2014.08.001
  4. Miller MC, Berger RA, Petrella AJ, Karmas A, Rubash HE. Optimizing femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; (392): 38-45. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200111000-00005
  5. Olcott CW, Scott RD. The Ranawat Award. Femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; (367): 39-42.
  6. Hanada H, Whiteside LA, Steiger J, Dyer P, Naito M. Bone landmarks are more reliable than tensioned gaps in TKA component alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; 462: 137-42. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e3180dc92e7
  7. Murakami AM, Hash TW, Hepinstall MS, Lyman S, Nestor BJ, Potter HG. MRI evaluation of rotational alignment and synovitis in patients with pain after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012; 94(9): 1209-15. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B9.28489
  8. Romero J, Stähelin T, Binkert C, Pfirrmann C, Hodler J, Kessler O. The clinical consequences of flexion gap asymmetry in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22(2): 235-40. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.04.024
  9. Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998; (356): 144-53. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199811000-00021
  10. Barrack RL, Schrader T, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Myers L. Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; (392): 46-55. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200111000-00006
  11. Bell SW, Young P, Drury C, Smith J, Anthony I, Jones B, et al. Component rotational alignment in unexplained painful primary total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2014; 21(1): 272-7. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.09.011
  12. Clayton ML, Thirupathi R. Patellar complications after total condylar arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982; (170): 152-5.
  13. Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, Park SD. The relationship between the survival of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of knee prosthesis. Int Orthop. 2014; 38(2): 379-85. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2097-9
  14. Whiteside LA. Choosing your implant: cementless, patella sparing, and posterior cruciate ligament retaining. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20(4 Suppl 2): 10-1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.03.028
  15. Kim YH, Kim JS, Yoon SH. Alignment and orientation of the components in total knee replacement with and without navigation support: a prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007; 89(4): 471-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B4.18878
  16. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(2): 236-43. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00386
  17. Jenny JY, Boeri C. Computer-assisted implantation of total knee prostheses: a case-control comparative study with classical instrumentation. Comput Aided Surg. 2001; 6(4): 217-20. doi: 10.1002/igs.10006
  18. Abdel MP, Oussedik S, Parratte S, Lustig S, Haddad FS. Coronal alignment in total knee replacement: historical review, contemporary analysis, and future direction. Bone Joint J. 2014; 96-B(7): 857-62. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B7.33946
  19. Hetaimish BM, Khan MM, Simunovic N, Al-Harbi HH, Bhandari M, Zalzal PK. Meta-analysis of navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012; 27(6): 1177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.12.028
  20. Schmitt J, Hauk C, Kienapfel H, Pfeiffer M, Efe T, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, et al. Navigation of total knee arthroplasty: rotation of components and clinical results in a prospectively randomized study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011; 12: 16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-16
  21. Laddha M, Gaurav S. Assessment of Limb Alignment and Component Placement After All Burr Robotic-Assisted TKA. Indian J Orthop. 2020; 55(Suppl 1): 69-75. doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00269-2
  22. Zhang J, Ndou WS, Ng N, Gaston P, Simpson PM, Macpherson GJ, et al. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved accuracy and patient reported outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022; 30(8): 2677-95. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06464-4
  23. Battenberg AK, Netravali NA, Lonner JH. A novel handheld robotic-assisted system for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: surgical technique and early survivorship. J Robot Surg. 2020; 14(1): 55-60. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-00907-w
  24. Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993; (286): 40-7.
  25. Freeman MA, Todd RC, Bamert P, Day WH. ICLH arthroplasty of the knee: 1968--1977. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1978; 60-B(3): 339-44. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.60B3.681410
  26. Insall J, Scott WN, Ranawat CS. The total condylar knee prosthesis. A report of two hundred and twenty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979; 61(2): 173-80.
  27. D'Lima DD, Hermida JC, Chen PC, Colwell CW Jr. Polyethylene wear and variations in knee kinematics. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; (392): 124-30. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200111000-00015
  28. Chalmers BP, Kolin DA, Mayman DJ, Miller TM, Jerabek SA, Haas SB, et al. Three Degrees External to the Posterior Condylar Axis Has Little Relevance in Femoral Component Rotation: A Computed Tomography-Based Total Knee Arthroplasty Simulation Study. J Arthroplasty. 2021; 36(7S): S380-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.12.028
  29. Choi YJ, Lee KW, Park JS. Early Results of Total Knee Arthroplasty Using a Built-in 3-Degree External Rotation Prosthesis. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2013; 25(3): 112-6. doi: 10.5792/ksrr.2013.25.3.112
  30. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; (404): 7-13. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200211000-00003
  31. Moon YW, Ha CW, Do KH, Kim CY, Han JH, Na SE, et al. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment. Comput Aided Surg. 2012; 17(2): 86-95. doi: 10.3109/10929088.2012.654408
  32. Khuangsirikul S, Popuk S, Heebthamai D, Phruetthiphat OA, Chotanaphuti T. Comparison Between Image-Free Robotic Assisted and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: Postoperative CT Assessment of Alignment. J Southeast Asian Med Res. 2020; 4(1): 16-3.
  33. Clark TC, Schmidt FH. Robot-Assisted Navigation versus Computer-Assisted Navigation in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Efficiency and Accuracy. ISRN Orthop. 2013; 2013: 794827. doi: 10.1155/2013/794827
  34. Fadda M, Marcacci M, Toksvig-Larsen S, Wang T, Meneghello R. Improving accuracy of bone resections using robotics tool holder and a high speed milling cutting tool. J Med Eng Technol. 1998; 22(6): 280-4. doi: 10.3109/03091909809010012
  35. Van Ham G, Denis K, Vander Sloten J, Van Audekercke R, Van der Perre G, De Schutter J, et al. Machining and accuracy studies for a tibial knee implant using a force-controlled robot. Comput Aided Surg. 1998; 3(3): 123-33. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0150(1998)3:3<123::AID-IGS4>3.0.CO;2-#

Abstract   |   Reference

MOJ footer

About Us

The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is a peer-reviewed journal that is published three times a year in both print and electronic online version. The purpose of this journal is to publish original research studies, evaluation of current practices and case reports in various subspecialties of orthopaedics and traumatology, as well as associated fields like basic science, biomedical engineering, rehabilitation medicine and nursing.

Keep in Touch

creative-commons License