MOJ Header

Current Issue - March 2026, Volume 20, Issue No. 1

Official Journal of Malaysian Orthopaedic Association and ASEAN Orthopaedic Association

Treating Intertrochanteric Fracture by Short and Long Cephalomedullary Nail: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

References

  1. Browner BD. Skeletal Trauma: Basic Science, Management, and Reconstruction. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2009.
  2. Heckman JD, McKee M, McQueen MM, Ricci W, Tornetta III P, eds. Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014.
  3. Dunn J, Kusnezov N, Bader J, Waterman BR, Orr J, Belmont PJ. Long versus short cephalomedullary nail for trochanteric femur fractures (OTA 31-A1, A2 and A3): a systematic review. J Orthop Traumatol. 2016; 17(4): 361-7. doi: 10.1007/s10195-016-0405-z
  4. Bridle SH, Patel AD, Bircher M, Calvert PT. Fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. A randomised prospective comparison of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991; 73(2): 330-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.73B2.2005167
  5. Butt MS, Krikler SJ, Nafie S, Ali MS. Comparison of dynamic hip screw and gamma nail: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Injury. 1995; 26(9): 615-8. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(95)00126-t
  6. Hoffman CW, Lynskey TG. Intertrochanteric fractures of the femur: a randomized prospective comparison of the Gamma nail and the Ambi hip screw. Aust N Z J Surg. 1996; 66(3): 151-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1996.tb01144.x
  7. Aune AK, Ekeland A, Odegaard B, Grøgaard B, Alho A. Gamma nail vs compression screw for trochanteric femoral fractures. 15 reoperations in a prospective, randomized study of 378 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1994; 65(2): 127-30. doi: 10.3109/17453679408995418
  8. Radford PJ, Needoff M, Webb JK. A prospective randomised comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the gamma locking nail. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993; 75(5): 789-93. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.75B5.8376441
  9. Horwitz DS, Tawari A, Suk M. Nail Length in the Management of Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Femur. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016; 24(6): e50-8. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00325
  10. Breceda A, Sands A, Zderic I, Schopper C, Schader J, Gehweiler D, et al. Biomechanical analysis of peri-implant fractures in short versus long cephalomedullary implants following pertrochanteric fracture consolidation. Injury. 2021; 52(1): 60-65. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.09.037
  11. Daner WE III, Owen JR, Wayne JS, Graves RB, Willis MC Jr. Biomechanical evaluation of the risk of secondary fracture around short versus long cephalomedullary nails. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017; 27(8): 1103-8. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-1989-6
  12. Marmor M, Elliott IS, Marshall ST, Yacoubian SV, Yacoubian SV, Herfat ST. Biomechanical comparison of long, short, and extended-short nail construct for femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Injury. 2015; 46(6): 963-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.03.005
  13. Zhang Y, Zhang S, Wang S, Zhang H, Zhang W, Liu P, et al. Long and short intramedullary nails for fixation of intertrochanteric femur fractures (OTA 31-A1, A2 and A3): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017; 103(5): 685-90. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.04.003
  14. Markowicz D, Newman JM, Kim SJ, Plymale M, Lovy A. Long Gamma nail versus short Gamma nail in the treatment of stable intertrochanteric fractures: is it worth it? A cost benefit analysis and a systematic review. Curr Orthop Pract. 2014; 25(4): 347-51. doi: 10.1097/BCO.0000000000000120
  15. Sohatee MA, Bennet J. A systematic review of short versus long intramedullary fixation in the management of pertrochanteric fractures. Trauma. 2017; 20(3): 161-8. doi:10.1177/1460408617717538
  16. Page PRJ, Poole WEC, Shah K, Upadhyay PK. Short or long intramedullary devices for hip fracture? A systematic review of the evidence. J Orthop. 2020; 22: 377-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.08.030
  17. Kanakaris NK, Tosounidis TH, Giannoudis PV. Nailing intertrochanteric hip fractures: short versus long; locked versus nonlocked. J Orthop Trauma. 2015; 29 Suppl 4: S10-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000286
  18. Du PZ, Barton D, Menghani SV, Kempton DM, Lowe J. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Short, Intermediate, and Long Cephalomedullary Nails: A Retrospective Review. J Am Coll Surg. 2020; 231(4): S185. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.07.303
  19. Luque R, Rizo B, Arvinius C, Lopiz Y, Marco F. AO/OTA 31-A2 Fractures: Long or Short Gamma Nail. Biomed J Sci Tech Res. 2017; 1(6): 1784-8. doi: 10.26717/BJSTR.2017.01.000539
  20. Hulet DA, Whale CS, Beebe MJ, Rothberg DL, Gililland JM, Zhang C, et al. Short Versus Long Cephalomedullary Nails for Fixation of Stable Versus Unstable Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures at a Level 1 Trauma Center. Orthopedics. 2019; 42(2): e202-9. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20190118-03
  21. Goodnough LH, Salazar BP, Furness J, Feng JE, DeBaun MR, Campbell ST, et al. How are peri-implant fractures below short versus long cephalomedullary nails different? Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021; 31(3): 421-7. doi: 10.1007/s00590-020-02785-1
  22. Sadeghi C, Prentice HA, Okike KM, Paxton EW. Treatment of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures with Long versus Short Cephalomedullary Nails. Perm J. 2020; 24: 19.229. doi: 10.7812/TPP/19.229
  23. Enns PA, Nyberg SM, Berg GM, Galliart MA, Sarauer BD, Scheer AA, et al. Clinical Outcomes of Intermediate-Length Cephalomedullary Nails for Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture Repair in Older Adults. Kans J Med. 2020; 13: 106-11.
  24. Parker MJ, Cawley S. Short (175 mm) versus standard (220 mm) length intramedullary nail for trochanteric hip fractures: a randomized trial of 229 patients. Bone Joint J. 2020; 102-B(3): 394-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B3.BJJ-2019-0776.R3
  25. Horner NS, Samuelsson K, Solyom J, Bjørgul K, Ayeni OR, Östman B. Implant-Related Complications and Mortality After Use of Short or Long Gamma Nail for Intertrochanteric and Subtrochanteric Fractures: A Prospective Study with Minimum 13-Year Follow-up. JB JS Open Access. 2017; 2(3): e0026. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.17.00026
  26. Boone C, Carlberg KN, Koueiter DM, Baker KC, Sadowski J, Wiater PJ, et al. Short versus long intramedullary nails for treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (OTA 31-A1 and A2). J Orthop Trauma. 2014; 28(5): e96-e100. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182a7131c
  27. Frisch NB, Nahm NJ, Khalil JG, Les CM, Guthrie ST, Charters MA. Short Versus Long Cephalomedullary Nails for Pertrochanteric Hip Fracture. Orthopedics. 2017; 40(2): 83-8. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20161116-01
  28. Galanopoulos IP, Mavrogenis AF, Megaloikonomos PD, Vottis CT, Mitsiokapa E, Koulouvaris P, et al. Similar function and complications for patients with short versus long hip nailing for unstable pertrochanteric fractures. Sicot J. 2018; 4: 23. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2018023
  29. Guo XF, Zhang KM, Fu HB, Cao W, Dong Q. A comparative study of the therapeutic effect between long and short intramedullary nails in the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly. Chin J Traumatol. 2015; 18(6): 332-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2015.12.001
  30. Hari Krishnan B, Rai SK, Vikas R, Kashid M, Mahender P. A comparative study of the fracture union between long and short proximal femoral intramedullary nails antirotation in the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly: a multicentric analysis. Int J Res Orthop. 2019; 5(2): 288-94. doi: 10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20190793
  31. Hong CC, Nashi N, Makandura MC, Tan JH, Peter L, Murphy D. The long and short of cephalomedullary nails in the treatment of osteoporotic pertrochanteric fracture. Singapore Med J. 2017; 58(2): 85-91. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2016048
  32. Hou Z, Bowen TR, Irgit KS, Matzko ME, Andreychik CM, Horwitz DS, et al. Treatment of pertrochanteric fractures (OTA 31-A1 and A2): long versus short cephalomedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma. 2013; 27(6): 318-24. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31826fc11f
  33. Kleweno C, Morgan J, Redshaw J, Harris M, Rodriguez E, Zurakowski D, et al. Short versus long cephalomedullary nails for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures in patients older than 65 years. J Orthop Trauma. 2014; 28(7): 391-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000036
  34. Krigbaum H, Takemoto S, Kim HT, Kuo AC. Costs and Complications of Short Versus Long Cephalomedullary Nailing of OTA 31-A2 Proximal Femur Fractures in U.S. Veterans. J Orthop Trauma. 2016; 30(3): 125-9. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000521
  35. Mahesh Kumar NB, Mahesh U, Kumar S. Long proximal femoral nail versus short proximal femoral nail in treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures-a prospective randomized comparative study. Indian J Orthop Surg. 2017; 3(1): 46-53. doi: 10.18231/2395-1362.2017.0010
  36. Li Z, Liu Y, Liang Y, Zhao C, Zhang Y. Short versus long intramedullary nails for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures in patients older than 65 years. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015,15;8(4):6299-302.
  37. Shyamkumar C, Srinivasa Rao A, Venkateswara Rao D, Vikramkumar J. Comparative Study between Long Pfn And Short Pfn in Treatment of Stable Intertrochanteric Fracture Femur. IOSR-JDMS. 2018; 17(1): 23-9. doi: 10.9790/0853-1701132329
  38. Lindvall E, Ghaffar S, Martirosian A, Husak L. Short Versus Long Intramedullary Nails in the Treatment of Pertrochanteric Hip Fractures: Incidence of Ipsilateral Fractures and Costs Associated With Each Implant. J Orthop Trauma. 2016; 30(3): 119-24. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000420
  39. Okcu G, Ozkayin N, Okta C, Topcu I, Aktuglu K. Which implant is better for treating reverse obliquity fractures of the proximal femur: a standard or long nail? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471(9): 2768-75. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2948-0
  40. Parmar DS, Porecha MM, Chudasama SL. Long proximal femoral nails versus short proximal femoral nails for the management of proximal femoral fractures: a retrospective study of 124 patients. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2011; 21(3): 159-64. doi: 10.1007/s00590-010-0683-8
  41. Raval P, Ramasamy A, Raza H, Khan K, Awan N. Comparison of Short vs Long Anti-rotation in Treating Trochanteric Fractures. Malays Orthop J. 2016; 10(1): 22-8. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.1603.005
  42. Sellan M, Bryant D, Tieszer C, Papp S, Lawendy A, Liew A, et al. Short Versus Long InterTAN Fixation for Geriatric Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures: A Multicentre Head-to-Head Comparison. J Orthop Trauma. 2019; 33(4): 169-74. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001409
  43. Shannon SF, Yuan BJ, Cross WW 3rd, Barlow JD, Torchia ME, Holte PK, et al. Short Versus Long Cephalomedullary Nails for Pertrochanteric Hip Fractures: A Randomized Prospective Study. J Orthop Trauma. 2019; 33(10): 480-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001553
  44. Thamyongkit S, MacKenzie JS, Sirisreetreerux N, Shafiq B, Hasenboehler EA. Outcomes after unstable pertrochanteric femur fracture: intermediate versus long cephalomedullary nails. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020; 46(5): 963-8. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-1002-z
  45. Vaughn J, Cohen E, Vopat BG, Kane P, Abbood E, Born C. Complications of short versus long cephalomedullary nail for intertrochanteric femur fractures, minimum 1 year follow-up. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015; 25(4): 665-70. doi: 10.1007/s00590-014-1557-2
  46. Tan GKY, Chong CS, Bin Abd Razak HR. Clinical outcomes following long versus short cephalomedullary devices for fixation of extracapsular hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1): 23997. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03210-1
  47. Dragosloveanu Ș, Dragosloveanu CDM, Cotor DC, Stoica CI. Short vs. long intramedullary nail systems in trochanteric fractures: A randomized prospective single center study. Exp Ther Med. 2022; 23(1): 106. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.11029
  48. Norris R, Bhattacharjee D, Parker MJ. Occurrence of secondary fracture around intramedullary nails used for trochanteric hip fractures: a systematic review of 13,568 patients. Injury. 2012; 43(6): 706-11. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.10.027
  49. Larose G, Tufescu T, Graham C. Periprosthetic fracture rate after short and long hip nails: Analysis of a regional health database. Injury. 2022; 53(6): 2195-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.03.001
  50. Dubey S, Iyer RD, Azam MQ, Sarkar B, Nongdamba H. Thigh Pain and Peri-Implant Fractures with the Use of Short Cephalo-medullary Nails: A Retrospective Study of 122 Patients. Malays Orthop J. 2022; 16(3): 17-23. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2211.004
  51. Womble TN, Kirk A, Boyle M, Comadoll SM, Su L, Srinath A, et al. Comparison of Short, Intermediate, and Long Cephalomedullary Nail Length Outcomes in Elderly Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2022; 6(3): e21.00322. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00322
  52. Cheng YX, Sheng X. Optimal surgical methods to treat intertrochanteric fracture: a Bayesian network meta-analysis based on 36 randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020; 15(1): 402. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01943-9
  53. Nasim O, Kohli S, Eskander B, Girgis S, Kent M. Periprosthetic Fractures in Long Versus Short Proximal Femoral Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fractures: A 10-Year Single-Centre Cohort Study. Cureus. 2022; 14(12): e32892. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32892

Abstract   |   Reference

MOJ footer

About Us

The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is a peer-reviewed journal that is published three times a year in both print and electronic online version. The purpose of this journal is to publish original research studies, evaluation of current practices and case reports in various subspecialties of orthopaedics and traumatology, as well as associated fields like basic science, biomedical engineering, rehabilitation medicine and nursing.

Keep in Touch

creative-commons License