Current Issue - July 2026, Volume 20, Issue No. 2

1. Standring S, ed. Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 40th ed. Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier; 2008.
2. Frazer JE. The Anatomy of the Human Skeleton. 2nd ed. London, J & A Churchill; 1920. p. 138-40. https://archive.org/details/anatomyofhumansk00frazuoft/anatomyofhumansk00frazuoft/page/n205/mode/2up
3. Gilligan I, Chandraphak S, Mahakkanukrauh P. Femoral neck-shaft angle in humans: variation relating to climate, clothing, lifestyle, sex, age and side. J Anat. 2013; 223(2): 133-51. doi: 10.1111/joa.12073
4. White TD, Black MT, Folkens PA. Human Osteology. 3rd ed. San Diego: Academic Press. 2011.
5. Hsu CE, Shih CM, Wang CC, Huang KC. Lateral femoral wall thickness. A reliable predictor of post-operative lateral wall fracture in intertrochanteric fractures. Bone Joint J. 2013; 95-B(8): 1134-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B8.31495
6. Baer M, Neuhaus V, Pape HC, Ciritsis B. Influence of mobilization and weight bearing on in-hospital outcome in geriatric patients with hip fractures. SICOT J. 2019;5:4. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2019005.
7. Fung W, Jonsson A, Buhren V, Bhandari M. Classifying intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur: does experience matter? Med Princ Pract. 2007; 16(3): 198-202. doi: 10.1159/000100390
8. Müller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P, Schatzker J. The Comprehensive Classification of Fractures of Long Bones. 1st ed. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag; 1990.
9. Behrendt C, Faleiro TB, Schulz Rda S, Silva BO, Paula Filho EQ. Repruducibility of tronzo and ao/asif classifications for transtrochanteric fractures. Acta Ortop Bras. 2014; 22(5): 275-7. doi: 10.1590/1413-78522014220500884
10. Jayachandra Pillai T, Lakshmi Devi CK, Sobha Devi T. Osteometric Studies on Human Femurs. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2014; 13(2): 34-9.
11. Devane PA, Coup R, Horne JG. Proximal femoral osteotomy for the treatment of hip arthritis in young adults. ANZ J Surg. 2002; 72(3): 196-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2002.02344.x
12. Prasad R, Vettivel S, Isaac B, Jeyaseelan L, Chandi G. Angle of torsion of the femur and its correlates. Clin Anat. 1996; 9(2): 109-17. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1996)9:2<109::AID-CA3>3.0.CO;2-C
13. Kielbasinski-Podlaszewska O, Bekvalac J, Williams RL, Adds PJ. The innominate tubercle of the femur: Application to anterior surgical approaches to the hip. Clin Anat. 2017; 30(5): 578-84. doi: 10.1002/ca.22870
14. Ward MH, Williams RL, Bekvalac J, Bajada S, Maheson M, Adds PJ. The innominate tubercle of the femur is a consistent surgical landmark and shows no variation between sex and side: An osteological study. Clin Anat. 2021; 34(5): 742-47. doi: 10.1002/ca.23714
15. Beck TJ, Ruff CB, Scott WW Jr, Plato CC, Tobin JD, Quan CA. Sex differences in geometry of the femoral neck with aging: a structural analysis of bone mineral data. Calcif Tissue Int. 1992; 50(1): 24-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00297293
16. Simmermacher RK, Bosch AM, Van der Werken C. The AO/ASIF-proximal femoral nail (PFN): a new device for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. Injury. 1999; 30(5): 327-32. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(99)00091-1
17. Klaber I, Besa P, Sandoval F, Lobos D, Zamora T, Schweitzer D, et al. The new AO classification system for intertrochanteric fractures allows better agreement than the original AO classification. An inter- and intra-observer agreement evaluation. Injury. 2021; 52(1): 102-5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.07.020
18. Tardieu C, Damsin JP. Evolution of the angle of obliquity of the femoral diaphysis during growth--correlations. Surg Radiol Anat. 1997; 19(2): 91-7.
19. Anderson JY, Trinkaus E. Patterns of sexual, bilateral and interpopulational variation in human femoral neck-shaft angles. J Anat. 1998; 192 (Pt 2)(Pt 2): 279-85. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.1998.19220279.x
20. Calis HT, Eryavuz M, Calis M. Comparison of femoral geometry among cases with and without hip fractures. Yonsei Med J. 2004; 45(5): 901-7. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2004.45.5.901
21. Dinçel VE, Sengelen M, Sepici V, Cavuşoğlu T, Sepici B. The association of proximal femur geometry with hip fracture risk. Clin Anat. 2008; 21(6): 575-80. doi: 10.1002/ca.20680
22. Caetano EB, Serafim AG, Padoveze EH. Study of the Collo-diaphyseal Angle of the Femur of Corpses in the Anatomy Department of the PUC-SP Medical School. Int J Morphol. 2007; 25(2): 285-8. doi: 10.4067/S0717-95022007000200006
23. Isaac B, Vettivel S, Prasad R, Jeyaseelan L, Chandi G. Prediction of the femoral neck-shaft angle from the length of the femoral neck. Clin Anat. 1997; 10(5): 318-23. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1997)10:5<318::AID-CA5>3.0.CO;2-M
24. Osorio H, Schorwer K, Coronado C, Delgado J, Aravena P. Proximal femoral epiphysis anatomy in the Chilean population. Orthopedic and forensic aspects. Int J Morphol. 2012; 30(1): 258-62

Abstract   |   Reference